All notes
Everything here, by subject. Most people arrive with one situation: home visits, night work, a shop closing alone, or a system that exists and has never been tested.
All 50 notes
The subjects stay in view on the left while the list scrolls, because the sections are deliberately uneven — most of this collection is about the response chain and very little about equipment, which is roughly the opposite of how the money usually gets spent.
The device is the first link of six. Most of what protects anybody is decided before it is ever pressed.
The links that actually fail: the one with nobody in it at three in the morning, the list with a wrong number, and the alert nobody believes any more.
Chosen last, after the chain exists, and by the people who will wear it. Comfort is not a preference here; it determines coverage.
The same chain arranged differently. Home visits are the largest group and the least controllable environment.
Scheduling is the most powerful control in this subject and is rarely treated as one. Testing is the only way to know whether any of it works.
- Near Misses and the Things Not Reported
- Training That Changes Anything
- What It Costs and What It Saves
- Involving the People It Is For
- Testing the Whole Chain
- Where to Start
- How These Programmes Fail
- Who Owns the Arrangement
- Small Organisations
- Scheduling as a Safety Control
- The Policy Document
- The First Ninety Days
- The Numbers Worth Watching
- The Thing You Are Spending
The duty is to assess and control, not to buy equipment. The absence of an assessment is the finding in most enforcement action here.
Almost all of them substitute something visible for something structural: a device for staffing, a document for a tested chain.
Where the controls that work sit furthest from the device, and where the organisation's own arrangements frequently produce the risk.
The end state as a checklist, the limits stated plainly, and the five arrangements that cost nothing.